GHG accounting across all three scopes, climate risk built into the same register, and natural-resource and product-level disclosures - all drawing on one data model instead of a spreadsheet rebuilt every reporting cycle.
Everything burned, leaked or released on-site or by a company-controlled fleet - captured at facility and vehicle level, not estimated from a fuel-spend total.
Fuel burned on-site for heat, power or industrial process - boilers, furnaces, generators and turbines.
Company-owned and leased vehicles - road fleet, off-road equipment, and where relevant, owned aircraft or vessels.
Refrigerant leaks, industrial process emissions and other releases that don't come from combustion at all.
Reported both ways the GHG Protocol requires - location-based against the grid you actually sit on, and market-based against what you've actually contracted to buy.
Grid electricity draw, metered by facility and matched to the correct grid-mix emission factor.
Purchased thermal energy - district heating, steam and chilled water - accounted the same way as electricity.
Both figures reported side by side, so a renewable energy contract shows up honestly rather than replacing the grid reality.
Typically 70%+ of a company's total footprint, and the category most competitors estimate from spend data. SYNE builds it from supplier-submitted primary data and product-level LCA instead.
Purchased goods & services, capital goods, fuel- and energy-related activities, upstream transportation, waste and business travel.
Downstream transportation, processing and use of sold products, end-of-life treatment, franchises and investments.
Suppliers submit activity data directly through the platform - the same traceability layer SYNE Trust runs on.
Every scope draws on the same emission-factor library and LCA data set, so numbers stay consistent whether they're used for a regulator filing or a lender's risk model.
From target-setting to governance maturity - the same risk register that scores a customer's portfolio also scores the climate strategy behind this disclosure.
Asset-level physical risk (flood, heat, water stress) and transition risk (policy, market, technology shift), scored continuously.
Emissions-reduction targets benchmarked against 1.5°C-aligned pathways, with scenario analysis behind the number.
Board-level oversight of climate strategy, tracked as a maturity score rather than a yes/no checkbox.
Water, waste and pollutant impact - the environmental data that sits alongside carbon, not folded into it.
Basin-level water stress data attached to every facility, not a single global water-use figure.
Waste tracked by type and destination - landfill, incineration, recycling or recovery - not a single tonnage total.
NOx, SOx, particulate matter and other pollutants, tracked separately from GHG accounting.
Where environmental impact meets what you actually sell - product-level LCA, supplier disclosures, and the packaging and land-use reporting that sits behind them.
Cradle-to-grave LCA for 300,000+ products, built from actual commodity and process data, not a category average.
Supplier-submitted environmental data verified against underlying records, across a 2M+ supplier network.
Packaging material and recyclability data, alongside biodiversity and land-use impact by site.
Every Environmental data point runs into the same register used for climate risk scoring.