SYNE Climate Risk Management is unifying physical, transition, nature, water, supply-chain, regulatory, financial climate risk along with emissions risk into one continuously-scored ecosystem, with climate modelling that translates exposure directly into SYNE Climate Value at Risk. This is climate risk specifically, not general enterprise, financial or operational risk - so the evidence and the exposure it explains live on one page, not two.
Need advisory support putting this to work? Explore Professional Services →
Each category is scored continuously from live data - not reconstructed once a year for an audit.
Acute and chronic hazards that damage assets and disrupt operations.
Exposure to the shift toward a lower-carbon economy.
Dependencies on ecosystem services that are already degrading.
Where water becomes the binding constraint on operations.
Concentration and disruption risk in the inputs a business depends on.
Exposure to carbon and climate-linked regulation as it actually applies, jurisdiction by jurisdiction.
Every category draws on the same underlying data model - so a facility's flood exposure and a supplier's shipping-route risk are directly comparable, not built on different assumptions.
Physical risk is modelled based on each location, in granularity - combining satellite observation, ground sensor data and forward-looking climate model downscaling, so the impact of any climate event becomes predictable for SYNE.
Extreme-heat day frequency, workforce productivity loss, cooling-cost escalation and heat-driven asset degradation.
Riverine, coastal and flash-flood exposure, modelled to facility footprint using elevation and hydrology data.
Fire-weather indices, proximity to fuel load and historical burn-scar patterns, refreshed each fire season.
Tropical cyclones, hurricanes and hailstorms - wind and precipitation severity scored against asset construction standards.
Precipitation deficit and soil-moisture trends, tracked against agricultural and operational water dependency.
Transition risk isn't a single number - it's the combined effect of policy, price, technology and market shifts, each tracked as the regulatory and commercial landscape moves.
Exposure to carbon taxes, emissions trading schemes and border adjustment mechanisms such as CBAM, modelled against current and proposed price pathways.
Policy tightening and stranded-asset risk from standards that phase out or restrict specific assets, processes or products.
Disruption risk from lower-carbon substitutes reaching cost parity faster than incumbent assets can be depreciated.
Fossil-fuel phase-down exposure and energy-mix shift risk, scored against each asset's current energy dependency.
Nature-related risk is where TNFD-aligned disclosure is heading - and where most risk registers still have the least visibility.
Land-use change, deforestation exposure and habitat loss tracked against every facility and sourcing region in the register.
Operational reliance on pollination, soil health and other ecosystem services - mapped through input-output dependency modelling, not self-reported estimates.
Water risk is scored at basin level and facility level together - because a business can be water-secure on paper and water-constrained in the specific basin it actually operates in.
Basin-level water-stress indices and scarcity trends, tracked against facility-level withdrawal volumes.
Contamination and pollution risk to the water sources a facility or its suppliers depend on.
Reliance on municipal supply, irrigation systems or shared infrastructure - and how resilient that infrastructure actually is.
Condition and performance risk in the water infrastructure a facility owns or depends on - sewage treatment plants (STP), effluent treatment plants (ETP), rainwater and water-harvesting systems, and desalination or recycling assets.
Supply-chain risk is scored down to the individual supplier - drawing on the same 2M+ supplier register used across the platform - with particular depth in sectors where single-source dependency is common.
Active pharmaceutical ingredient sourcing concentration, scored for single-source and geographically-clustered exposure.
Critical device and component supply risk, including semiconductor and precision-component dependencies.
Fuel and power input dependency, including exposure to single-grid or single-supplier energy arrangements.
Raw material and mineral concentration risk, scored where a small number of sources account for most of a category's supply.
Logistics-route and port-disruption risk, including chokepoint exposure and historical delay patterns by route.
Commodity, perishability and seasonal-yield risk across agricultural inputs and processed food supply chains.
Feedstock and precursor concentration risk, a large and often overlooked exposure across agriculture-linked and industrial supply chains.
Carbon and climate regulation now carries a direct cost - scored the same way as any other risk category, mapped to the specific jurisdictions an entity actually trades in or operates from.
Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism exposure for goods imported into the EU, scored by embedded emissions and covered sector.
Direct carbon tax and emissions-trading scheme exposure, jurisdiction by jurisdiction, priced against an entity's actual emissions profile.
Exposure to mandatory climate disclosure regimes - CSRD, SEC-adjacent and equivalent regimes - where non-compliance itself carries financial risk.
Physical, transition, nature, water and supply-chain risk aren't just environmental categories - each one carries a financial consequence and a non-financial one, scored side by side.
Asset valuation impact, insurance and premium exposure, cost-of-capital effects, and balance-sheet exposure to unhedged physical and transition risk.
Regulatory and compliance exposure, reputational risk, operational disruption, and legal or liability exposure arising from the same underlying events.
A risk score tells you where exposure sits. Climate Value at Risk (Climate VaR) puts a probability-weighted number on it - translating physical, transition, water and supply-chain risk into the same quantitative language used for financial risk.
The maximum expected loss from climate exposure at a given confidence level (95% or 99%) over a defined time horizon - a single figure finance teams can hold assets or portfolios against.
The average loss in the scenarios beyond the VaR threshold - where standard VaR understates severity, CVaR captures how bad the tail actually gets.
Modelling specific adverse events - a 1-in-100-year flood, a sudden carbon-price shock - to see the acute impact on a given asset or portfolio, independent of probability weighting.
Running the register through forward-looking pathways - including NGFS scenarios (Orderly, Disorderly, Hot House World) - to see how exposure evolves under different climate and policy futures.
The six risk categories above aren't self-reported - each one is underwritten by continuous monitoring across six categories, each cross-validated against at least one other independent source.
Multispectral and high-frequency satellite imagery for large-scale land and asset monitoring.
In-situ sensors and field surveys that verify what satellites can only estimate from orbit.
Authoritative external data, ingested and cross-checked rather than taken at face value.
Water bodies, basins and flows, mapped and tracked rather than estimated from rainfall averages.
Land-use change and encroachment, tracked against historical baselines for every monitored site.
Air quality, biodiversity and ecosystem health, tracked as continuously as physical assets.
No single category stands alone - satellite observation is checked against ground sensors, ground sensors against third-party records, so no score downstream rests on one unverified source.
Satellite observation is the backbone of the monitoring layer - the only method that can watch every asset in the register at once, and watch it again tomorrow.
Beyond visible light - vegetation health, moisture content and material composition, read from spectral bands the human eye can't see.
Daily to weekly revisit cycles, so change is caught within days - not discovered a year later at the next audit.
Every site carries a multi-year historical baseline, so today's imagery is compared against an actual trend, not a single snapshot.
Imagery is tagged and clipped to the exact footprint of each registered asset - not a regional average dressed up as a site figure.
Satellites see the surface. Ground data confirms what's actually happening at it - and calibrates every satellite estimate against it.
Distributed soil sampling points that verify carbon content, moisture and contamination at ground truth, not remote estimate.
Continuous readings for moisture, temperature and soil chemistry, streamed rather than collected on a periodic field visit.
Ground readings are used to calibrate and correct satellite-derived estimates for that specific site - not applied as a generic correction factor.
Manual field surveys feed directly into the same register - no separate spreadsheet reconciled at year-end.
External data is only as useful as the diligence applied to it - every third-party feed is cross-validated against at least one independent source before it enters the register.
National weather and river-gauge data, integrated to underpin flood, drought and storm exposure modelling.
Ground-stability and seismic-hazard records, relevant to asset siting and long-term physical risk assessment.
Peer-reviewed environmental and climate datasets, incorporated where they improve on operational data quality.
No third-party feed is accepted as a sole source - every integration is checked against satellite or ground data before use.
Water digitisation turns basins, watersheds and withdrawal points into a live data layer - the same data that underwrites SYNE Climate Risk Management's water-risk register.
Every facility's water source mapped to its actual basin - not assumed from national or regional averages.
Continuous water-level data for surface reservoirs and groundwater aquifers a facility actually depends on.
Contamination and pollution tracking for the specific water sources feeding operations, not a generic regional quality index.
Withdrawal points and shared infrastructure dependencies mapped, so infrastructure risk is visible before it becomes a shortage.
Land encroachment and deforestation rarely happen overnight - they happen gradually, at the edges. That's exactly where continuous monitoring outperforms an annual site visit.
Every monitored parcel compared against its own historical baseline to flag change as soon as it appears.
Automated alerts the moment vegetation loss or boundary encroachment is detected at a monitored site.
Consistent monitoring of land and facility boundaries - relevant for both regulatory compliance and physical security.
Multi-year land-cover records for every site, so a single image is always read against a documented trend.
Environmental monitoring covers what neither a supplier survey nor a satellite pass alone can fully capture - air, biodiversity and the broader ecosystem a business actually operates within.
Particulate and pollutant concentration data for monitored sites, tracked against local and international thresholds.
Habitat intactness and biodiversity indices tracked over time - the same data used in SYNE Climate Risk Management's nature-risk scoring.
Dependencies on pollination, water filtration and other ecosystem services, mapped to the operations that rely on them.
Point-source pollution identification near monitored sites, flagged before it shows up in a community or regulatory complaint.
The same satellite, ground and third-party data supports two distinct outputs - a physical evidence base for risk and insurance, and an audit-ready evidence base for regulators and raters.
Asset-level monitoring data that underwrites physical, water and nature risk scores in SYNE Climate Risk Management, and supports underwriting and stress-test modelling for insurers.
Audit-ready monitoring records that back Enterprise Sustainability's disclosures and underpin the independent scoring that SYNE Ratings applies at arm's length.
Coverage alone doesn't tell you how much to trust a number. Every monitoring data point in SYNE Climate Risk Management carries a confidence score based on source quality, cross-validation, and how recently it was refreshed.
Every satellite-derived estimate is calibrated against in-situ ground data wherever ground coverage exists, correcting for local conditions a remote sensor can't see.
No score rests on one source alone - satellite, ground and third-party records are checked against each other before a figure enters the register.
Every data point carries an explicit confidence percentage, so downstream products know exactly how much weight to place on it.
As new satellite passes and ground reports arrive, confidence scores are recalculated automatically - not reset once a year.
A continuously-scored, independently-monitored register is genuinely useful well beyond the team that maintains it - here's what it changes for six different perspectives.
A single register instead of five spreadsheets across facilities, business units and geographies, backed by asset-level monitoring no annual site visit could match - with a costed view of where resilience investment actually pays back.
Asset-level physical and transition risk, independently verified against collateral condition, that plugs directly into green-lending pricing and portfolio monitoring - a loan book's climate exposure as a live number, not an annual estimate.
Asset-level physical risk scores and stress-test outputs, grounded in satellite and ground-sensor evidence, that support underwriting and premium pricing with data more granular than regional catastrophe models alone.
Comparable Climate VaR and CVaR figures across a portfolio of issuers or assets, giving investors a consistent basis to evaluate exposure and price it into allocation decisions.
Consistent, audit-ready risk data with a clear line back to source imagery and sensor readings - built for the same scenario and stress-test expectations regulators already require of financial institutions.
Sector and country-level visibility into physical, water and supply-chain exposure across the economy, refreshed continuously rather than surveyed periodically - useful for infrastructure planning and national adaptation strategy alike.
SYNE Climate Risk Management isn't a standalone report - it's the data layer the rest of the platform is priced, verified and disclosed against.
The same risk register maps directly to CSRD, TCFD and GRI disclosure requirements - no separate data collection exercise.
SYNE Ratings draws on this same register - kept arm's-length - for ESG, sustainability and carbon ratings.
Green and sustainability-linked loans are originated and priced directly against the register's financial-risk lens.
Supply-chain risk scores flow into cradle-to-grave product tracking, down to the individual supplier.
A well-scored register isn't just a compliance artefact - it's the basis for a sustainable investment opportunity. SYNE Plus matches investors, founders and lenders against this same climate risk scoring, so capital finds the assets already proven to be lower-risk.
Illustrative examples of SYNE Climate Risk Management deployed across sectors.
Challenge: Three single-source suppliers of active pharmaceutical ingredients, with no visibility into their own climate or geopolitical exposure.
Supply-chain risk scoring flagged two tier-1 suppliers in flood-prone regions, prompting a dual-sourcing plan before the next monsoon season - not after a stock-out.
Challenge: Water availability risk varied sharply across five sourcing regions, with no consistent way to compare them.
A single water-risk score per region let procurement compare exposure directly, instead of relying on anecdotal reports from local teams.
Challenge: A 40-asset portfolio spanning multiple flood and heat zones, with insurance renewals due across three different quarters.
Asset-level physical risk scores, verified against satellite and ground-sensor monitoring, gave the fund a defensible basis to negotiate premiums ahead of renewal, rather than accepting insurer pricing as given.
Challenge: No consistent way to quantify exposure to carbon pricing and technology shifts across a mixed generation portfolio.
A single transition-risk score, rescored quarterly, replaced a static annual scenario analysis that was out of date within months of publication.
Once climate risk is scored and verified, here's where organisations typically take it next.
Bring your asset, supplier and operational data - or start from sector benchmarks. Walk away with a live, independently-monitored view of where your exposure actually sits.